So, I've talked about this before in this very newsletter, but I think one of the mistakes people can make in dealing with Trump is assuming there must be somewhere he gets the stuff he says, if not some starting point or basis in reality, then some deep strategic purpose.
For sure. Even having known how much he outright lies, I had foolishly been assuming that “Dan Bishop was behind by 17 points” meant he had at least seen (notoriously unreliable) *internal* polling that had him behind by at least 10 or something. 🤦🏻♀️ Reality— he just makes stuff up.
For sure. Even having known how much he outright lies, I had foolishly been assuming that “Dan Bishop was behind by 17 points” meant he had at least seen (notoriously unreliable) *internal* polling that had him behind by at least 10 or something. 🤦🏻♀️ Reality— he just makes stuff up.